
Firefish vs TrackerRMS
Firefish and TrackerRMS both combine ATS and recruitment CRM functionality, including tools for business development and temp or contract recruitment. The useful differences are in how each product fits your desk, the processes you need for UK recruitment and how website, candidate and commercial data connect. Here is what to compare before choosing your next CRM.
Trusted by growing recruitment agencies



.png)
.png)
.png)
Why agencies choose Firefish
See business development through to revenue
Work with UK temp requirements
Own your candidate attraction route
Support from a UK-based team


Compare the two approaches
| What to compare | TrackerRMS | Firefish |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment coverage | ATS/CRM for permanent, temp, contract and other placement types. | Dedicated temp, contract and perm workflows, with a shared candidate and client database. |
| Business development | Sales CRM, opportunity pipelines and AI-assisted outreach. | Lead pipelines, email sequences, contact enrichment and reporting from BD through placement. |
| Rates and compliance | Configurable pay/bill rates and temp/contract functionality. | Client/job/site rates, post-parity and overtime rules, plus AWR-related and break configuration. |
| Back-office workflow | Timesheets, expenses and invoicing functionality, with payroll integrations. | Timesheets for temp and contract bookings, with Hiring Manager Portal approvals and pay-and-bill connections through partners; no native payroll engine. |
| AI and automation | TrackerAI and automation capabilities, including candidate alignment tools. | Matching, record assistance, content support and CRM workflow automation. |
| Agency websites | Career-site and website routes, including Jobs+ and third-party website partners. | Optional agency website module connected to the CRM; candidate portal also available as an add-on. |
| Job distribution | Broad distribution through partner networks. | Direct CRM job posting to supported job boards. |
| Geography and support | International business with UK, US and other market coverage. | UK-built and UK-supported platform, used by agencies operating in multiple markets. |

"We are now using the system to support revenue reporting which has supported internal streamlining of processes."


Run UK temp and contract work with the right detail

Turn candidate attraction into a usable database

Connect BD activity to account performance

Other Modules
FAQs
Both are substantial ATS/CRM platforms with recruitment and sales features. Compare UK temp workflow detail, the candidate attraction setup, back-office requirements, usability, support and the commercial reports your team needs.
Yes. TrackerRMS advertises a sales CRM, pipelines and TrackerAI. The useful comparison is how each system's BD workflows and reporting work for your team.
Firefish is not a payroll engine. It includes timesheets for temp and contract bookings, with client approval through the Hiring Manager Portal, and connects to supported pay-and-bill and back-office tools. TrackerRMS offers more back-office features within its own platform.
TrackerRMS offers website and careers-site routes, including partner solutions. Agencies can add an optional CRM-connected website module in Firefish, with applications stored in the CRM.
TrackerRMS advertises extensive distribution through partners. Firefish connects to a selection of major UK job boards and others. Check your actual advertising channels, application tracking and additional posting costs rather than comparing board counts alone.
If built-in expenses/invoicing or an internationally oriented operating model are central to your requirements, TrackerRMS may suit you. Firefish is worth testing where UK temp workflows, commercial visibility and candidate attraction are priorities.
Yes. Candidate, contact and job migration is scoped as part of implementation and training, covering data quality, integrations and adoption.
Compare the workflows that matter to your agency







